Skip to main content
Aviado Research Library

Because “studies show” isn’t enough.

18 papers, tiered on a transparent rubric. Read the evidence your supplement rests on — before you swallow it.

18 studies0 supplements10 health goalsLast re-review May 4, 2026

Explore research pillars

Editor's picks

Reviewed by Aviado ResearchBrowse all

Latest research

Updated weeklyFull archive →

Browse by health goal

10 domains · v2.7 rubricAll categories →

Explore by pillar

Goal-level hubs that cluster the evidence — and the biomarkers that connect them.
How we tier evidence

Every claim gets the same rubric.

We don’t rate supplements — we rate claims about supplements. A single ingredient can earn Strong evidence for one benefit and Insufficient for another. The tier tells you how seriously to take a specific conclusion, not the molecule in general.

Strong
4 studies

At least two concordant RCTs with low-to-moderate risk of bias, or a high-certainty GRADE meta-analysis. This is where we feel confident saying yes.

Moderate
9 studies

One well-designed RCT plus replicated observational data. The signal is real; the effect size isn’t locked down.

Preliminary
5 studies

Early human data, mixed results, or a single trial. We report it, but we don’t bet the farm on it.

Insufficient

Animal-only studies, mechanism-only claims, or anecdote. We index these so you know they exist, not so you swallow them.